lilywang wrote:... Patrick Chan is a very good skater also, and if Plushy continue to compete, he will be a very serious challenge. Plushy will compete with Chan like just he did with so many other great skaters in the past, it is no different....
... if ISU Judging System and judges this allow him
Tell me something - as far as I know, not much changed the marks in GOE and PCS this season?
Dassska wrote:cekoni wrote:Just comparison - Chan (GPF 2010/2011) + Plushy (2010 Olympics)
Народ, ау...стьоимость квадов в этом сезоне изменили. и вообще всю базу по прыжкам перекроили в пользу сложности.
...
Irisha2010 wrote:Нельзя так сравнивать. Нужно сравнить программу Жени и Патрика по новым правилам, как говорится ,привести к общему знаменателю. Кажется уже где то было,т.е.программа Жени, не уверена,не помню. Только надо ли?
Can we then dont count "Base Value"... then only "famous" GOE (from TES) and PCS - which is also some kind of old "Interpretation", aka - undetermined categories by a free evaluation of each judge
just GOE (in TES): Chan 86.94-78.22= 8.72 GOE
Plushy 82.71-75.03= 7.68 GOE
Chan 8.72 - Plu 7.68 .... total difference: 1.04PCS (Program Components Score) - first mark is Chan, second Plushy:
Skating Skills 8.71 - 8.60 (0.11)
Transition / Linking Footwork 8.54 - 7.25 (1.29)
Performance / Execution 8.50 - 8.80 (only here is Plushy better +0.30)
Choreography / Composition 8.86 - 8.20 (0.66)
Interpretation 9.00 - 8.75 (0.25)
Chan 87.22 - Plu 82.80 .... total difference: 4.42So, by judges - Chan better skated his FS on GPF, than Plushy at Olympics... so much --->
5.46Do you think same?
Виктория wrote:... мне кажется, что эти несусветные оценки, в том числе, и посыл Плющенко от ИСУ. Мол, не надо тебе возвращаться. Подсознательно они боятся и не хотят его возвращения. ИМХО.
Same conclusion
